Who Benefits From A War Between The United States And Syria? 5


Source: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com

By Michael Snyder

Who Benefits From A War Between The United States And Syria?


Saudi-Arabia-Photo-by-Keepscases-300x300Someone wants to get the United States into a war with Syria very, very badly.  Cui bono is an old Latin phrase that is still commonly used, and it roughly means “to whose benefit?”  The key to figuring out who is really behind the push for war is to look at who will benefit from that war.  If a full-blown war erupts between the United States and Syria, it will not be good for the United States, it will not be good for Israel, it will not be good for Syria, it will not be good for Iran and it will not be good for Hezbollah.  The party that stands to benefit the most is Saudi Arabia, and they won’t even be doing any of the fighting.  They have been pouring billions of dollars into the conflict in Syria, but so far they have not been successful in their attempts to overthrow the Assad regime.  Now the Saudis are trying to play their trump card – the U.S. military.  If the Saudis are successful, they will get to pit the two greatest long-term strategic enemies of Sunni Islam against each other – the U.S. and Israel on one side and Shia Islam on the other.  In such a scenario, the more damage that both sides do to each other the happier the Sunnis will be.

There would be other winners from a U.S. war with Syria as well.  For example, it is well-known that Qatar wants to run a natural gas pipeline out of the Persian Gulf, through Syria and into Europe.  That is why Qatar has also been pouring billions of dollars into the civil war in Syria.

So if it is really Saudi Arabia and Qatar that want to overthrow the Assad regime, why does the United States have to do the fighting?

Someone should ask Barack Obama why it is necessary for the U.S. military to do the dirty work of his Sunni Muslim friends.

Obama is promising that the upcoming attack will only be a “limited military strike” and that we will not be getting into a full-blown war with Syria.

The only way that will work is if Syria, Hezbollah and Iran all sit on their hands and do nothing to respond to the upcoming U.S. attack.

Could that happen?


Let’s hope so.

But if there is a response, and a U.S. naval vessel gets hit, or American blood is spilled, or rockets start raining down on Tel Aviv, the U.S. will then be engaged in a full-blown war.

That is about the last thing that we need right now.

The vast majority of Americans do not want to get embroiled in another war in the Middle East, and even a lot of top military officials are expressing “serious reservations” about attacking Syria according to the Washington Post

The Obama administration’s plan to launch a military strike against Syria is being received with serious reservations by many in the U.S. military, which is coping with the scars of two lengthy wars and a rapidly contracting budget, according to current and former officers.
Having assumed for months that the United States was unlikely to intervene militarily in Syria, the Defense Department has been thrust onto a war footing that has made many in the armed services uneasy, according to interviews with more than a dozen military officers ranging from captains to a four-star general.

For the United States, there really is no good outcome in Syria.

If we attack and Assad stays in power, that is a bad outcome for the United States.

If we help overthrow the Assad regime, the rebels take control.  But they would be even worse than Assad.  They have pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda, and they are rabidly anti-American, rabidly anti-Israel and rabidly anti-western.

So why in the world should the United States get involved?

Read more

Image credit: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com

  • BigIron8

    The real object of attacking the “lawful” government of Syria is NOT what is best for Syria, nor is it even what’s best for the US but what best suits the goals and plans of the NWO/PTB! Allowing the “rebels” to gain control of Syria is not in the best interest of the US or Syria … only best for whatever plans the NWO has in mind.

  • BigIron8

    Our political system is a one-party system composed of two pseudo-parties. They are controlled by the NWO/PTB and give us a pseudo-choice of two preselected candidates of which their choice will be the one elected for their purposes, not ours!

    It is not our government anymore! To the world elites, as they consider themselves, “we are just so many steaks on the platter to be consumed for their “pleasure”, no better than cattle”.

  • Ed

    Hmmm, let me think. What will take the people’s minds away from the fact that we, the government, cannot fix the financial system that we have totally screwed up?

  • msbetz

    Obama! And only Obama, it’s all a diversion tactic to cover for BENGAZI!

  • sharonsj

    The U.S. was doing the bidding of Saudi Arabia long before Barack Obama. The Bush family is a long-time ally and of course anything to do with oil means Bush, Cheney, and their ilk make a lot of money.