Posts tagged rights

Farmer Faces Over 2 Years Jail, $10K Fines for Feeding Community

0

Source: http://www.activistpost.com

Farmer-Faces-Over-2-Years-Jail-10K-Fines-for-Feeding-CommunityFarmer Faces Over 2 Years Jail, $10K Fines for Feeding Community

Things are heating up in Baraboo, Wisconsin as a long awaited food rights trial approaches.

Raw milk drinkers are outraged that Wisconsin DATCP is bringing criminal charges against a farmer who serves a private buying club. Do citizens have a right to contract with a producer and grow food to their own standards? That is what is at stake in this case. – Kimberly Hartke, Publicist Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund

Customers and Other Supporters to Attend Court with Farmer

Food rights activists from around North America will meet at the Sauk County Courthouse in this tiny town on May 20 to support Wisconsin dairy farmer Vernon Hershberger and food sovereignty. Hershberger, whose trial begins that day, is charged with four criminal misdemeanors that could land this husband and father in county jail for up to 30 months with fines of over $10,000…

The Wisconsin Department of Agricultural Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) targeted Hershberger for supplying a private buying club with fresh milk and other farm products.

DATCP has charged Hershberger with, among other things, operating a retail food establishment without a license. Hershberger repeatedly rejects this, citing that he provides foods only to paid members in a private buying club and is not subject to state food regulations.

Hershberger says:

There is more at stake here than just a farmer and his few customers — this is about the fundamental right of farmers and consumers to engage in peaceful, private, mutually consenting agreements for food, without additional oversight.

A little more than a year ago, food rights activists from around the country stood in support of Hershberger at a pre-trial hearing. They read and signed a “Declaration of Food Independence” that asserts inherent rights in food choice. This month after the trial each day, many of the same food rights activists plus others will gather at the Al Ringling Theater across the street from the courthouse and hear presentations by leaders in the food rights movement. Notable speakers include Virginia farmer Joel Salatin, Mountain Man show star Eustace Conway, and food rights organizer from Maine, Deborah Evans.

Hershberger, and other farmers around the country, are facing state or federal charges against them for providing fresh foods to wanting individuals. In recent months the FDA has conducted several long undercover sting operations and raids against peaceful farmers and buying clubs that have resulted in farms shutting down and consumers without access to the food they depend on.

Vernon has faced a lot of pre-hearings and postponements already. Legal concerns are mounting. Printable flyers and an account from his May 7th hearing appear here.

This is a landmark precedent-setting case that could forever change food access rights. In addition, did you know that a Wisconsin judge who declared that we have no inherent right to the healthy foods of our choice retired and went to work for Monsanto?

Watch for more info and a recap on the battle:

YouTube Preview Image

“Natural Rights vs The Patriot Act” by Judge Andrew Napolitano

0
YouTube Preview Image

Posted by JudgeNapolitanoFTW

Judge Napolitano discusses Natural Rights and why The Patriot Act is exactly the type of legislation the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to PREVENT! Courtesy of Campaign For Liberty.

 

 

Martial Law in Boston Did Not Catch the Suspect

4
Image source: http://www.shtfplan.com

Image source: http://www.shtfplan.com

I awoke this Saturday morning reflecting back on the heinous crime committed causing loss of life and so many casualties, grieving for the victims and their families.  Then reflecting on the massive manhunt for this 19 year old, the lone surviving suspect of the crime, and the level that this manhunt has grown to.  It appears all levels of law enforcement were involved, from local police to federal agents.  Looking back at the massive amount of man (and woman) hours involved, the millions of dollars expended in the pursuit and lost community revenues due to city lock downs, along with the MSM spin time devoted to the coverage of the man hunt for this suspect, I think back to how this would have been handled in the pre-police militarization state we find our selves in.

When all is said and done, for now, the suspected criminal in custody, the cities are no longer locked down and life in these towns resume.  So is it to be assumed the man hunt mission was triumphant?  The police state enacting marshal law and locking down five cities came up empty handed.  It took a home owner checking his personal property to find the suspect and close the current chapter of this story that a dominating military presence in the local streets could not, at least up to that point in time.

In the end, five cities locked down, cell phone service killed, people locked into their homes, military and militarized police patrolling the streets and entering to search door to door.  The result when the victim was captured was praise and adulation, mission accomplished.  The other mission accomplished was the social engineering, not only to the people in the Boston area, but also all those tuning in to the MSM, as armored personnel carriers, SWAT teams on roof top and police carrying M-16 rifles (called assault weapons if owned by civilians) while searching your homes are a good thing, as giving up person freedom and liberty is a small price to pay for false security.  Finally, the assistance of an alert home owner was needed to accomplish what the police state was having great difficulty in completing.

My appreciation to Daniel’s post below featured on Lew Rockwell.

###

Martial Law in Boston Did Not Catch the Suspect

Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com

By Daniel McAdams

Look at these chilling photos of a major American city under total martial law. The local police force and investigative units have switched over to military assault vehicles on the streets, robo-cop science-fiction soldiers plugged in to all manner of spooky devices looking like the Borg and screaming orders like “if you want to live, turn off your cell phones.”

We read the shocking full story in the Washington Post today. Perhaps some of us are too naive, but this still seems unreal in the United States:

“By order of the state, a public transit system that serves more than 1.3 million riders a day was padlocked. Amtrak trains were suspended between Boston and New York. Businesses, offices and some of the world’s greatest universities were shut. Taxis were ordered off the streets for part of the day. Residents were instructed to stay inside.”

As does this:

“An indication of the complex investigation ahead came Friday night, when an Obama administration official told NBC News that Tsarnaev would not be given a Miranda warning when he is physically able to be interrogated after receiving medical treatment.

“Instead, the official said, the government will invoke a legal rule known as the ‘public safety exception,’ which will enable investigators to question Tsarnaev without first advising him of his right to remain silent and to be afforded legal counsel.”

But this is what strikes one the most, pondering all of the above: the police state did not catch the suspect. The borg did not catch the suspect. Martial law did not catch the suspect. People forced to stay in their homes did not catch the suspect. Warrantless searches did not catch the suspect.

 

Like the government’s initial failure (or worse) to identify and apprehend the suspects before the bombing, the government also failed in its military assault on an entire city.

Let us never forget that Dzhokar Tsarnaev was discovered by a private citizen, who happened to go out and check on his boat (i.e. violating the lockdown order of the cops), see a body inside of it, and call the cops. In other words, the police state achieved nothing but the psychological conditioning of the population: when we, the state, decide any particular event is important enough, you will lose every single right including possibly the right to life if you resist.

Writing in the Washington Times Communities section, Thomas Mullen sums it up nicely:

19-year-old Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokar Tsarnaev is in custody. Assuming that Tsarnaev is indeed guilty of these crimes, a very real threat to public safety has been taken off the streets. That’s the good news.

The bad news is that the Tsarnaev brothers have taken the last vestiges of a free society in America down with them.

The Bill of Rights was already on life support before this tragedy. Before the dust settled after 9/11, the 4th Amendment had been nullified by the Patriot Act. The 5th and 6th Amendments were similarly abolished with the Military Commission Act of 2006 and the 2012 NDAA resolution, which contained a clause allowing the president to arrest and indefinitely detain American citizens on American soil without due process of law.

This legacy is the real Boston tragedy. The Rubicon has been crossed.

2nd Amendment Day Rally, Clarksville, TN – March 29, 2013

0
YouTube Preview Image

Posted by Gunblastdotcom

Jeff Quinn ( http://www.gunblast.com ) attended the 2nd Amendment Day rally in Clarksville, TN on March 29th, 2013. The featured speaker was State Senator Mark Green (R, District 22). We had a nice turnout, and more rallies are planned for the future. We encourage all freedom-loving Americans to attend similar rallies near them, and STAND UP to those who want to strip away our precious, God-given rights.

Please visit and appreciate the event organizers:

Senator Mark Green:
http://www.markgreenfortennessee.com/

Tennessee Gun Country:
http://www.tnguncountry.com/

Midsouth Shooters Supply:
http://www.midsouthshooterssupply.com/

Freedom Deli:
http://freedomdeliusa.com/

Studio 931:
http://studio931.com/

Your Kids — Like Your Money and Guns — Belong to the “Community”

1

Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com

MSNBC Cadre Member: Your Kids — Like Your Money and Guns — Belong to the “Community”

By William Grigg

MSNBC Cadre Member: Your Kids -- Like Your Money and Guns -- Belong to the "Community"

Whenever a progressive refers to “investments,” he or she is referring to confiscation of private wealth.

Whenever a progressive invokes the “community,” that term refers to a state-engineered collective in which the individual has no rights.

Whenever a collectivist refers to “public education,” that phrase is shorthand for the process of destroying a child’s developing sense of self-ownership and indoctrinating them in the notion that they are the property of the “community.” This process is also known as “socialization,” which is the indefinable value-added element that supposedly makes “public education” superior to homeschooling.

Whenever an advocate of “public education” refers to “our children,” conscientious parents should take a quick inventory of their arsenals.

Melissa Harris-Perry, a slogan-spewing news reader for the Stalinist media outlet called MSNBC, ran the table of these collectivist nostrums in a recent installment in the network’s “Lean Forward” ad campaign. The “Lean Forward” spots feature various MSNBC luminaries holding forth like Communist Party functionary exhorting the cadres at a “struggle session” in the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

Harris-Perry is a collectivist of such passionate conviction that she regards opposition to Obama’s radical centralization of power to be a species of sedition. She considers private firearms to be a pestilence, but embraces a vision of social engineering that would require a great amount of gun-related violence by state functionaries. Although she is a credentialed academic, she has the odd and annoying habit, so common among adolescents, of ending every statement with a vocal inflection that suggests a question. In her “Lean Forward” ad, she uncorked this specimen of unfiltered collectivist cant:

“We have never invested as much in public education, because we’ve always had a sort of private notion of children – your kid is yours, and totally your responsibility. We haven’t had a very collective notion of, `These are our children.’ So part of it is that we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities. Once it’s everybody’s responsibility, and not just the household’s, then we start making better investments.”

Like many others of her ideological persuasion, Harris-Perry is a stranger to concision. Someone who represented a slightly different strain of collectivism – albeit not as different as Harris-Perry would insist – stated the matter much more tidily almost exactly eighty years ago:

“When an opponent declares, `I will not come over to your side,’ I calmly say: `Your child belongs to us already…. What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in this new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.”

Those words were spoken on November 6, 1933 by the community-organizing, civilian-disarming, socialized medicine-promoting, government stimulus-peddling, unitary executive who presided over Germany’s National Socialist government. When Harris-Perry and her comrades demand that we “Lean Forward,” that’s the direction they have in mind.

Canadian Government killing online surveillance bill

0

Source: http://www.cbc.ca

By Laura Payton, CBC News

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson says controversial Bill C-30 won’t go ahead

Government killing online surveillance bill Justice Minister Rob Nicholson says controversial Bill C-30 won't go ahead

Federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson says the controversial Bill C-30, known as the online surveillance or warrantless wiretapping bill, won’t go ahead after Canadians opposed it. (Colin Perkel/Canadian Press)

Federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson says the controversial Bill C-30, known as the online surveillance or warrantless wiretapping bill, won’t go ahead due to opposition from the public.

The bill, which was known as the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act, was designed to help police combat child pornography. But civil liberties and privacy groups — even the federal privacy commissioner — said the bill violated the rights of Canadians.

Opponents lobbied strenuously against C-30, saying it was an overly broad, “Big Brother” piece of legislation that would strip all Canadians of the right to privacy.

The bill would have required internet service providers to maintain systems to allow police to intercept and track online communications without a warrant.

Canadians rallied against the bill after Public Safety Minister Vic Toews famously told an opposition MP that he could “either stand with us or with the child pornographers.” Those explosive comments outraged many Canadians and helped to galvanize the opposition to C-30.

“We will not be proceeding with Bill C-30 and any attempts that we will continue to have to modernize the Criminal Code will not contain the measures contained in C-30, including the warrantless mandatory disclosure of basic subscriber information or the requirement for telecommunications service providers to build intercept capability within their systems,” Nicholson said.

“We’ve listened to the concerns of Canadians who have been very clear on this and responding to that.”

OpenMedia, which waged a vigorous online campaign against C-30 through its stopspying.ca website, hailed the decision to kill the bill.

“It came as a quite a surprise,” said Lindsey Pinto of OpenMedia.ca.

“It looks like the government has finally heard the voices of Canadians who have been expressing themselves online in stating that C-30 is invasive, costly and poorly thought out,” she said.

Nicholson made the announcement after introducing a bill to update provisions that would allow for warrantless phone tapping in emergencies.

Canadian law allows police to wiretap without authorization from a court when there is the risk of imminent harm, such as a kidnapping or bomb threat, but the Supreme Court last year struck down the law and gave Parliament 12 months to rewrite another one.

The new bill, C-55, would give peace officers the right to secretly intercept private communications without a warrant in relatively rare, urgent situations. Someone whose communications had been intercepted in situations of imminent harm would have to be notified by police within 90 days.

Read the bill here.

With files from The Canadian Press

###

Republished with permission

 

FULL Reality Check Special: Gun Control HD

0
YouTube Preview Image

Posted by F0x1214

Published on Feb 9, 2013

PLEASE SHARE – READ – SOURCES: http://www.fox19.com/story/21088630/t…

http://www.youtube.com/user/BenSwannR…

“It’s not about Left vs. Right… It’s about Liberty vs. Oppression”-Ben Swann

###

Related posts:

National Sheriff’s Association Announces They Will Not Support Unconstitutional Gun Control Laws

A Salute & Support to 2 Tennessee Sheriffs Standing Up for the US Constitution

242 Sheriffs and 5 State Sheriffs Associations Saying ‘NO’ to Obama Gun Control

Press Release: 5 State Associations Reaffirms Oath to the Constitution and 2nd Amendment

Sheriff Mack to Obama: “you have NO AUTHORITY to tell me what kind of gun I can own!”

Growing List of Sheriffs Saying ‘NO’ to Obama Gun Control

Has WWIII already begun? Gerald Celente breaks down the Past, Present, and Future

0
YouTube Preview Image

http://youtu.be/wuKposMraNU

 

Gary Franchi and Next News Network interview Trends forecaster Gerald Celente covering our current condition and future paths.  Topics discussed cover the economy, the power play behind ever expanding wars and the natural resources involved, Wall Street and the government blessing to the “too big to fail” organizations plus the recent gun control moves by the administration and the history behind it all.

National Sheriff’s Association Announces They Will Not Support Unconstitutional Gun Control Laws

0
YouTube Preview Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JJqG6bB0SiU

Sheriffs Speak Out – Will Not Support Unconstitutional Gun Laws

Related Posts:

A Salute & Support to 2 Tennessee Sheriffs Standing Up for the US Constitution

242 Sheriffs and 5 State Sheriffs Associations Saying ‘NO’ to Obama Gun Control

Press Release: 5 State Associations Reaffirms Oath to the Constitution and 2nd Amendment

Sheriff Mack to Obama: “you have NO AUTHORITY to tell me what kind of gun I can own!”

Growing List of Sheriffs Saying ‘NO’ to Obama Gun Control

A Salute & Support to 2 Tennessee Sheriffs Standing Up for the US Constitution

1

tn flagI am very happy to see and report that 2 Tennessee Sheriffs are standing up for our US Constitution and for the citizens of their respective counties.  In the latest updated list from CSPOA.org that is growing daily, now up to 242 supporting Sheriffs, Sheriff Jim Ruth from Bradley County and Sheriff Jim Hammond from Hamilton County have taken their oath seriously and their duty as the ultimate law officer over all the exists in their county.  Should you be fortunate to live in one of these two counties be sure to send a thank you message and show support equal to that support they are showing you.

On the not so pleasant side to the story, based on my understanding that there exists 95 counties in Tennessee, I see the lack of support for both the county citizens and the oath of office for the remaining 93 Sheriffs in the state of Tennessee.

Below is a link to a list of Tennessee Sheriffs based on the Tennessee Sheriffs’ Association web site.  Should your county Sheriff be one of the many not yet committed to supporting their oath and their county citizens please contact them and respectfully ask where they truly stand on issues, such as gun control, Federal non-Constitutional laws, and other illegal actions that may be carried out in your county in violation of your inalienable rights.  Feel free to point them to the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association website.

Here is the list to the Sheriffs of Tennessee.  Ask them where they stand regarding protecting the rights of citizens and where is their “line in the sand”.

Also, here is the list of supporting Sheriff’s Associations supporting.  Where is the Tennessee Sheriff’s Association?  Contact them here and find out: http://www.tnsheriffs.com/index.html

List of State Sheriff’s Associations

1. Utah Sheriffs Association

2. Florida Sheriffs Association

3. Georgia Sheriffs Association

4. Colorado Sheriffs Association

5. New Mexico Sheriffs Association

More information below.

National Sheriff’s Association Announces They Will Not Support Unconstitutional Gun Control Laws

242 Sheriffs and 5 State Sheriffs Associations Saying ‘NO’ to Obama Gun Control

Press Release: 5 State Associations Reaffirms Oath to the Constitution and 2nd Amendment

Sheriff Mack to Obama: “you have NO AUTHORITY to tell me what kind of gun I can own!”

Growing List of Sheriffs Saying ‘NO’ to Obama Gun Control

Go to Top