Posts tagged Fear

G Edward Griffin – Agenda 21 – Save Long Island Forum 1/18/14 (Video)



G Edward Griffin – Agenda 21 – Save Long Island Forum 1/18/14 (Video)


2-6-2014 9-48-42 PM


YouTube Preview Image


( H/T Liz Abbott )

Published by wearechangect

The legendary author G Edward Griffin was the headline speaker at the Save Long Island Forum talking about the eugenic plans of the UN’s Agenda 21 to covertly exterminate most of the world’s population.

Learn more about Save Long Island:
Check out the Save Long Island Forum website to see a list of all the speakers:

Parasite visit permanently rewires mouse brain, makes unafraid of cats




By CBC News

Parasite visit permanently rewires mouse brain, makes unafraid of cats


Suggests symptoms of a disease can persist long after cause is eliminated


A parasite that, for its own reproduction, makes mice lose their fear of cats can continue to affect mouse behaviour long after its departure, a new study has found.


A mouse infected with the Toxoplasma parasite loses its fear of cats, increasing the chance that the parasite will get into the cat’s intestinal system, the only place it can sexually reproduce. (Wendy Ingram/UC Berkeley)

The surprising discovery by University of California, Berkeley, molecular biology researcher Wendy Ingram, published this week in the journal PLoS  ONE, suggests that symptoms of a disease can sometimes persist long after the agent that caused it is gone.

Toxoplasmosis is single-celled parasite that can infect many birds and mammals, but can only reproduce inside the gut of a cat. That means that, after living inside other hosts, it must eventually find its way back into a cat.

In order to achieve that, with its own limited mobility, it has evolved an interesting mind-control technique — it causes mice to lose their natural fear of cats.

“When rodents get infected, the best way back to the primary host, the cat, is by making these mice a little foolhardy and wandering into cat territory,” Ingram told CBC’s Quirks & Quarks in an interview that airs Saturday.

“As soon as a mouse stumbles into cat territory, it’s pretty much at the end of the road.”

For the toxoplasmosis, however, that means a good chance of reaching its desired destination — the inside of the cat’s digestive system.

  • Hear the full interview with Wendy Ingram on Quirks & Quarks on Saturday, Sept. 21 at noon on CBC Radio One

Ingram and her colleagues were interested in figuring out just how the parasite manages to make mice lose their fear of cats.

In order to do that, they used genetic manipulation to produce a weakened strain of toxoplasmosis that the mouse immune system could easily clear.

To their surprise, the mice remained unafraid of cats even after the toxoplasmosis infection was long gone.

“This suggests that the parasite is actually going into the brain and causing a permanent change in the behavioural circuits in the mouse brain,” Ingram said.

Mechanism unknown

She and her colleagues are still not quite sure what the change is or how it is made. However,  there is some evidence that the toxoplasmosis parasite injects proteins or other molecules into large numbers of brain cells that it doesn’t infect.

Ingram said the research could present a new way to look at symptoms and infections, which aren’t always explained by modern medicine.

“Not only we look at what you currently have, but what you have had in the past.”

Copyright © CBC 2013

Republished with permission

Journalists fear covering the Benghazi story, don’t want to lose access (favored crony status)



By Nick Sorrentino

Journalists fear covering the Benghazi story, don’t want to lose access (favored crony status)




It’s perfectly reasonable to expect the White House to stonewall the Benghazi investigation. There are fears that whatever happened that night might reflect poorly on the president, and perhaps even more importantly now, on Hillary Clinton who wants to be president. It makes sense that a White House which plays hardball all the time, plays hardball with reporters.

It doesn’t make it right however. Some reporters, many who have long cheered this president are starting to speak out, softly.

I have no idea what happened on September 11th of 2012, right before the presidential election. But I’d like to know more. I think the country would like to know more.

(From Mediaite)

On July 31, CNN’s The Situation Room broadcast a portion of an interview conducted by reporter Arwa Damon with a suspect in the Benghazi attacks. The suspect revealed to Damon that no investigator has attempted to contact him regarding his involvement in that deadly assault. The following day, CNN’s Drew Griffin broke the news that more than 30 CIA agents were on the ground in Libya on the day of the attack and they are being pressured by the spy agency to not reveal to reporters or congressional investigators what they know of the events of that night. Some CNN reporters are reportedly fearful now that their access to the White House will be hampered following their probing into a story that members of the Obama administration would prefer remain uninvestigated…

…“I would suggest it’s not an accident that those who have been given a lot of access to the president have generally been AWOL when it comes to stories that might reflect poorly on him,” the source, who did not wish to be identified, continued. “It’s the name of the game. And it’s bad for everyone trying to do this job the right way.”

Click here for the story.

Inception – planting false memories in mice to create fear – Truthloader Investigates


Inception – planting false memories in mice to create fear


Video capture

Video capture


YouTube Preview Image


Published by Truthloader

A team of scientists have managed to plant false memories into the brains of mice, creating a sense of fear in a place where there is no reason for it, using a process they call incepting. Truthloader Investigates what a false memory is and why incepting has already raised ethical issues.

Here’s the mobile link to the report, I will replace it with a full link when I can get to a computer:…

George Orwell and the Cold War: A Reconsideration




George Orwell and the Cold War: A Reconsideration


[From Reflections on America, 1984: An Orwell Symposium. Ed. Robert Mulvihill. Athens and London, University of Georgia Press, 1986.]

In a recent and well-known article, Norman Podhoretz has attempted to conscript George Orwell into the ranks of neoconservative enthusiasts for the newly revitalized cold war with the Soviet Union.[1] If Orwell were alive today, this truly “Orwellian” distortion would afford him considerable wry amusement. It is my contention that the cold war, as pursued by the three superpowers of Nineteen Eighty-Four, was the key to their successful imposition of a totalitarian regime upon their subjects. We all know that Nineteen Eighty-Four was a brilliant and mordant attack on totalitarian trends in modern society, and it is also clear that Orwell was strongly opposed to communism and to the regime of the Soviet Union. But the crucial role of a perpetual cold war in the entrenchment of totalitarianism in Orwell’s “nightmare vision” of the world has been relatively neglected by writers and scholars.

In Nineteen Eighty-Four there are three giant superstates or blocs of nations: Oceania (run by the United States, and including the British Empire and Latin America), Eurasia (the Eurasian continent), and Eastasia (China, southeast Asia, much of the Pacific). The superpowers are always at war, in shifting coalitions and alignments against each other. The war is kept, by agreement between the superpowers, safely on the periphery of the blocs, since war in their heartlands might actually blow up the world and their own rule along with it. The perpetual but basically phony war is kept alive by unremitting campaigns of hatred and fear against the shadowy foreign Enemy. The perpetual war system is then used by the ruling elite in each country to fasten totalitarian collectivist rule upon their subjects. As Harry Elmer Barnes wrote, this system “could only work if the masses are always kept at a fever heat of fear and excitement and are effectively prevented from learning that the wars are actually phony. To bring about this indispensable deception of the people requires a tremendous development of propaganda, thought-policing, regimentation, and mental terrorism.” And finally, “when it becomes impossible to keep the people any longer at a white heat in their hatred of one enemy group of nations, the war is shifted against another bloc and new, violent hate campaigns are planned and set in motion.”[2]

From Orwell’s time to the present day, the United States has fulfilled his analysis or prophecy by engaging in campaigns of unremitting hatred and fear of the Soviets, including such widely trumpeted themes (later quietly admitted to be incorrect) as “missile gap” and “windows of vulnerability.” What Garet Garrett perceptively called “a complex of vaunting and fear” has been the hallmark of the American as well as of previous empires:[3] the curious combination of vaunting and braggadocio that insists that a nation-state’s military might is second to none in any area, combined with repeated panic about the intentions and imminent actions of the “empire of evil” that is marked as the Enemy. It is the sort of fear and vaunting that makes Americans proud of their capacity to “overkill” the Russians many times and yet agree enthusiastically to virtually any and all increases in the military budget for mightier weapons of mass destruction. Senator Ralph Flanders (Republican, Vermont) pinpointed this process of rule through fear when he stated during the Korean War:

Fear is felt and spread by the Department of Defense in the Pentagon. In part, the spreading of it is purposeful. Faced with what seem to be enormous armed forces aimed against us, we can scarcely expect the Department of Defense to do other than keep the people in a state of fear so that they will be prepared without limit to furnish men and munitions.[4]

This applies not only to the Pentagon but to its civilian theoreticians, the men whom Marcus Raskin, once one of their number, has dubbed “the mega-death intellectuals.” Thus Raskin pointed out that

their most important function is to justify and extend the existence of their employers. … In order to justify the continued large-scale production of these [thermonuclear] bombs and missiles, military and industrial leaders needed some kind of theory to rationalize their use. … This became particularly urgent during the late 1950s, when economy-minded members of the Eisenhower Administration began to wonder why so much money, thought, and resources, were being spent on weapons if their use could not be justified. And so began a series of rationalizations by the “defense intellectuals” in and out of the Universities. … Military procurement will continue to flourish, and they will continue to demonstrate why it must. In this respect they are no different from the great majority of modern specialists who accept the assumptions of the organizations which employ them because of the rewards in money and power and prestige. … They know enough not to question their employers’ right to exist.[5]

In addition to the manufacture of fear and hatred against the primary Enemy, there have been numerous Orwellian shifts between the Good Guys and the Bad Guys. Our deadly enemies in World War II, Germany and Japan, are now considered prime Good Guys, the only problem being their unfortunate reluctance to take up arms against the former Good Guys, the Soviet Union. China, having been a much lauded Good Guy under Chiang Kai-shek when fighting Bad Guy Japan, became the worst of the Bad Guys under communism, and indeed the United States fought the Korean and Vietnamese wars largely for the sake of containing the expansionism of Communist China, which was supposed to be an even worse guy than the Soviet Union. But now all that is changed, and Communist China is now the virtual ally of the United States against the principal Enemy in the Kremlin.

Along with other institutions of the permanent cold war, Orwellian New-speak has developed richly. Every government, no matter how despotic, that is willing to join the anti-Soviet crusade is called a champion of the “free world.” Torture committed by “totalitarian” regimes is evil; torture undertaken by regimes that are merely “authoritarian” is almost benign. While the Department of War has not yet been transformed into the Department of Peace, it was changed early in the cold war to the Department of Defense, and President Reagan has almost completed the transformation by the neat Orwellian touch of calling the MX missile “the Peacemaker.”



Related post:

Big Brother’s power is building, warns George Orwell biographer

Fear and Oath-ing in D.C.



Common sense commentary about the war on the American people.  “We’re just asking politicians to live up to their oath.”

YouTube Preview Image


Shock: Politician Tells Unadulterated Truth!



By Travis Holte

Now that Ron Paul has retired I think I have a new favorite pol, Belgian MP Laurent Louis. He pulls no punches in this speech, exposing the lies of the imperialist wars.

YouTube Preview Image

(Click on the subtitles icon for English). h/t Daily Paul.


For those not familiar with activating subtitles, please see the image below.

1-27-2013 2-18-19 AM

Video uploaded by Feuillien Geraldine

From the Youtube video description:


Belgian MP LAURENT LOUIS stands against war in Mali and exposes the international neo-colonial plot at the Belgian Parliament.

On January the 17th, 32 years old Belgiam MP Laurent Louis, the most controversial and demonized national political figure ever, explained why he voted against the belgian support to war in Mali. Meanwhile, he expressed his disgust and wrath against the criminal foreign policies of the belgian elite and its submission to foreign financial and interests groups. For the first time at the Belgiam Parliament, he evokes that 9/11 was made up and says what no one before him has never dared to speak out!

Please share this exceptional moment of truth. There were other interventions as powerful from that man regarding the necessity to re-open the DUTROUX CASE, since he has been confronted to official pictures of the pedophile’s little victims that dramatically contradicted the official version of the cause of their death.

I’ll translate his intervention on that subject within the next days because too many dark secrets are poisoning our democracies, and because it seems like in the heart of EUROPE, dark secrets have become a raw material.
Thank’s for sharing. This man needs and deserve our support.


F2C2012: Aaron Swartz keynote – “How we stopped SOPA”


F2C2012: Aaron Swartz keynote – “How we stopped SOPA”

YouTube Preview Image

Published on May 22, 2012

Aaron Swartz keynote – “How we stopped SOPA” at F2C:Freedom to Connect 2012, Washington DC on May 21 2012.

Please support #PDFTribute papers uploaded by academics in honour of Aaron Swartz are being scraped here: 

Face Scan to get in TN State Capitol Building?

I am afraid it’s so.  Now to have your grievances redressed by your government you will have to submit to a face scan.  Folks, we live in a police state.



By Tona

I am afraid it’s so.  Now to have your grievances redressed by your government you will have to submit to a face scan.  Folks, we live in a police state.

How did they get a biometric facial photo?  Likely your REAL ID drivers license.  Don’t you just love how you were informed that the State was taking a biometric photo of you?  Tennessee is one of 13 States to have complied with all 18 benchmarks of the REAL ID, which includes a biometric facial image capture.

It’s bad enough that you have to submit to x-rays.  Now have your face scanned.  What’s next, rectal inspections?

Read more about government privacy invasion through the drivers license here.  There are multiple articles.  Try reading them all.

My letter to the Tennessee General Assembly:

A facial scan to get into the capitol building is completely unacceptable.  One should not have to submit to tyrannical measures simply to redress their grievances.

Tennessee has become a vassal to the federal government, complying with all 18 benchmarks of the REAL ID act, while pretending to resist it through non-binding resolutions.  While you set around begging the federal government to repeal the unconstitutional law, your let State bureaucrats implement it anyway.

Stop the tyranny now.  People coming to the State legislature are not suspected of crimes.  There’s no probable cause to assume that someone discontent with their government and/or some law(s) is a criminal and needs to be searched through x-rays and facial scans simply to address their elected representatives.  Redress is protected by the first amendment.

Remember that you are servants of the people, not kings on thrones.  This pedestal of tyranny that you stand on needs to be knocked out from under you and destroyed.  If you are so afraid of serving, then don’t.  Let someone else who doesn’t live in fear, and therefore subject the people to tyranny as result, serve.

Let freedom ring!


Image added to original post.

Rand Paul single-handedly tries to stop NDAA

YouTube Preview Image

Just days before Thanksgiving, the US Senate was planning on taking a vote on the National Defense Authorization Act, but there has been a slight delay. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky has proposed an amendment halting the vote. In it, Paul reaffirms the sixth amendment guaranteeing a fair a speedy trial to all Americans which has been threatened by the NDAA. Brian Doherty, senior editor for Reason.Com, give us his take on the latest development.

Go to Top